ICC / Democratic Republic of the Congo / The Appeals Chamber upholds the decision on the admissibility of the case against Germain Katanga

THE HAGUE, Netherland, September 25, 2009/African Press Organization (APO)/ — ICC-CPI-20090925-PR455

Situation: Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

Case: The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui

On 25 September, 2009, the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) dismissed the appeal of Germain Katanga against Trial Chamber II’s decision of 12 June which declared his case admissible before the ICC.

In February 2009, Mr Katanga filed a motion with Trial Chamber II challenging the admissibility of the case before the ICC. He submitted, amongst other things, that the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) was able to prosecute him and that, accordingly, he should not be prosecuted before the ICC. He further submitted that the Prosecutor, when applying for a warrant of arrest, should have disclosed to the Pre-Trial Chamber certain documents indicating that Mr Katanga was under investigation in the DRC, which, he claimed, made the case inadmissible before the Court. On 12 June, the Trial Chamber rejected the challenge. The Defence appealed this decision.

Today, Judge Daniel David Ntanda Nsereko, acting as Presiding Judge, gave a summary of the Appeals Chamber’s judgment in open court. He explained each of the five grounds for appeal and the Chamber’s respective determinations:

The Defence submitted that Trial Chamber II erred in considering that the challenge to admissibility was filed out of time and that it should have been filed prior to the “commencement of the trial”. The Appeals Chamber noted that the appellant himself acknowledged that he did not suffer any prejudice from the Trial Chamber’s allegedly erroneous interpretation of the Rome Statute, because the Trial Chamber decided to consider the merits of his admissibility challenge. Since there was no prejudice, the Appeals Chamber did not deem it necessary to consider the merits of this first ground of appeal.

The Defence submitted that Trial Chamber II erred in considering that Pre-Trial Chamber I had determined the admissibility of the case on proper grounds, since the Prosecutor failed to disclose relevant documents concerning the attacks on Bogoro for which a warrant of arrest against Germain Katanga was requested. The Appeals Chamber considered that, were it to assess the merits of this second ground for appeal, it would, in effect, be assessing the correctness of the Pre-Trial Chamber’s decision on the warrant of arrest, and not of the decision of the Trial Chamber, which was the subject of the appeal.

The third and fourth grounds of appeal related to compliance with the principle of complementarity, under which priority is given to national systems. The ICC complements national criminal justice systems rather than replacing them. The Appeals Chamber found that the complementarity principle, as enshrined in the Statute, strikes a balance between safeguarding the primacy of domestic proceedings vis-à-vis the ICC, on the one hand, and, on the other, the goal of the Rome Statute to “put an end to impunity”. If States are unwilling or unable to investigate and, where necessary, prosecute, the ICC must be able to intervene. The Appeals Chamber also noted that, at the time of the admissibility proceedings in the present case, there were no proceedings against Mr Katanga in the DRC, whether for the crimes with which he is charged before this Court, or for other alleged crimes. On the contrary, the DRC has made it clear that it wished for him to be prosecuted before the ICC.

Under the fifth ground of appeal, the Defence for Mr Katanga disputed the fact that a State can decide whether or not it is willing to prosecute international crimes “without the need to justify or explain its unwillingness”. In the opinion of the Defence, that would lead to the accused being deprived of the right to effectively challenge the admissibility of the case based on a State being unable or unwilling to prosecute. However, the Appeals Chamber considered that this argument is misconceived, and held that whether or not a case is admissible is determined by the Court, which assesses the relevant facts against the criteria of article 17 of the Statute.

For these reasons, the Appeals Chamber upheld Trial Chamber II’s decision of 12 June, 2009 and dismissed the appeal.

Germain Katanga was transferred to the ICC on 17 October 2007. The charges against him were confirmed by Pre-Trial Chamber I on 26 September 2008. He and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui allegedly jointly committed, through other persons, crimes against humanity (murder; sexual slavery and rape) and war crimes (using children under the age of 15 to participate actively in hostilities; intentionally directing an attack against a civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; wilful killing; destruction of property; sexual slavery and rape). The trial in the case of The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui is scheduled to commence on 24 November 2009.

Case Information Sheet The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo

For further information, please contact Ms Sonia Robla, Head of the Public Information and Documentation Section at +31 (0)70 515-8089 or +31 (0) 646448726 or at sonia.robla@icc-cpi.int.

Congo Warlord Awaits ICC Trial